Act I (no access)

Act I (no access)

Act I (no access)

Act I (no access)

Act I (no access)


Act II : (almost whispering) how can we continue with what has been left? 

Act II : … with what has been made. How was this built? 

Act II : it might be a new beginning? 

Act II : (silent)*

Act II : there is no new beginning I think. It’s a kind of continuation and

Act II : … and the stage in between

Act II : will we be forgotten? 

Act II : never



Act III (no access) (wondering in anticipatory expectation)

Act III (no access)

Act III (no access)

Act III (no access) (afraid)

Act III (no access) (reassuring Scene III)


*  this project deals with rhythmical absence, with loss and the ubiquitous significance of dirt. three acts will be put into scene. one after the other. it is the moment the hand releases the reins, and the structure begins to dictate the builder. dirt is repositioned as the ‘formless’ that actively declassifies and destabilises the rigid hierarchies of artistic intent. rhythmical absence becomes the stutter in the command chain, the gap between human’s desire for order and the chaotic agency of the material itself. the room functions as a Foucauldian heterotopia, a counter-site where the normal rules of individual ownership and linear progression are suspended in favour of a collective, involuntary palimpsest. the core methodology is a ‘sequential usurpation’: three distinct groups enter the same enclosed space, not as creators in a vacuum, but as successors in a chain of compelled inheritance. this project is an exercise in radical receptivity.  by succeeding one another in a confined space filled with the residue of prior labor, this project dramatises the inevitable dissolution of authorship.